Mike sent us an assessment sheet with his feedback for our presentation. The sheet has ratings by number, 10 being high and 1 being low, as well as brief comments from Mike. Here is what it has told me. For knowledge and understanding of core materials we got a 7, which is slightly above average. We got the same score for Extent, quality and appropriateness of research, with Mike commenting 'Research evident but needs greater reflection on the presentations given by HOME'. As well as Conceptual grasp of issues, quality of arguments and ability to answer questions, where Mike commented 'Clear grasp of sustainability issues - not so much about issue of 'Perception'. For design concepts we got a 6, which is average, and Mike commented 'good initial ideas but underdeveloped'. We also got a 6 for evolution of the ideas, with Mike saying 'Evidence of lots of initial ideas' 'But evolution of ideas was lacking visually'. In the Quality of manag...